Lots of Proof For Paranormal Phenomena


0
Paranormal (1)
Paranormal (1)

Media Skeptics (or pseudoskeptics as we contact them) are fond of saying, “”There is no proof for any paranormal or psychic phenomena”” no matter how a great deal proof is shown to them, even if it really is a mountainful. They normally come across excuses to deny or dismiss the proof, even in the most unreasonable and irrational manner, then go back to repeating this claim as even though it have been a religious Gospel Law that could by no means be overturned. This is particularly aggravating simply because it really is like attempting to cause with a person who chooses to be blind and ignorant, and in total denial of information and reality. But the reality is that for some well-liked paranormal phenomena such as ESP or ghosts, there is a lot of extended standing proof of quite a few kinds – anecdotal, experiential and scientific. Controlled scientific experiments have yielded constructive outcomes for ESP for several years. From the 1940’s with JB Rhine, to the existing day with Dr. Charles Tart, Dr. Gary Schwartz, Rupert Sheldrake, and several other scientists, constructive and constant outcomes for psi have been identified to exist far above opportunity below controlled circumstances. And series of psi experiments that have been repeated for years recognized as The Ganzfeld Experiments, Autoganzfeld Experiments and PEAR (Princeton Engineering Anomalies Study) have yielded statistically substantial and constant outcomes above opportunity as nicely. In addition, the anecdotal and experiential proof is overwhelming. Research show that at least half the population of the globe has had paranormal experiences, and according to the National Science Foundation, “”60% of American either AGREE or STRONGLY AGREE that some folks either possess psychic skills or extrasensory perception””. That is A LOT, no doubt. Widespread sense would inform you that if half the folks in the globe have skilled anything, then it really is fairly a great deal specific that there is anything to it other than fraud, misperception and fantasy, particularly due to the fact a fantastic quantity of these experiencers contain credible down-to-earth folks as nicely. Likewise, huge percentage of folks of all kinds from all walks of life have skilled ghosts as well. So you see, the proof for such popular paranormal phenomena is big. As Parapsychologist Author Dean Radin has stated, the proof for psi is so strong and robust that if the very same high quality of proof existed for anything non-paranormal, it would undoubtedly have been accepted as confirmed. But simply because the paranormal is regarded taboo in the scientific establishment, there is a sort of censorship and expertise filtration toward it. There is an automatic adverse stigma and bias toward it that assumes that only crackpots think in such items. So any scientist who openly supports the legitimacy of paranormal phenomena seriously jeopardizes their profession and image amongst their colleagues. Therefore, most scientists who think in some paranormal phenomena will not declare it publicly, but turn out to be close enthusiasts. Mr. Radin found this, as several scientists confided in him their secret unofficial interest and belief that some of the paranormal is true. Even in regard to UFO’s, there is a lot of proof for them of quite a few kinds. UFO pictures and videos are controversial and vague of course, but several credible eyewitnesses, such as Air Force Pilots and Astronauts, have observed them. They’ve also been tracked on radar carrying out aerial maneuvers that man-created aircraft could not do. (And as you know, hallucinations do not seem on radar.) In a single popular official incident recognized as the Washington Merry Go Round Incident of 1952, jet fighters have been scrambled to intercept UFO’s soon after they had been tracked on radar. Afterward, to quell public panic, the incident was swiftly dismissed even though by no means completely explained. Nonetheless, anything substantial occurred to trigger the alarm and scrambling of fighters, and it wasn’t “”zero proof”” for positive. But if you believe that UFO proof is strictly confined to obscure sightings, believe once more. The popular Bentwaters UFO Incident that occurred on an American military base in England in 1980 involving two dozen military witnesses, such as Colonel Halt, of an up-close UFO sighting, remains an undebunked and compelling case. And soon after years of substantial investigations and interviews with Alien Abductees by Budd Hopkins and John Mack, who wrote books on the phenomenon, they concluded that there was extra to the abduction knowledge than mere hallucination or sleep paralysis. In addition, public coalitions such as The Disclosure Project have brought forth a huge pool of higher ranking government, military and intelligence officials and insiders, more than 400 presently, who have confessed to private expertise of government involvement with UFO’s and ET technologies, and the cover ups and secrecy surrounding it. (See a video of their testimonies at a public conference right here) Now, that is definitely NOT “”zero proof””! Nonetheless, pseudoskeptics who claim to only want proof continue to declare that “”there is no proof”” when they get a lot of it from credible sources. Naturally, they are in a state of perpetual denial and cognitive dissonance. They deny and filter out something that does not match into their materialistic reductionistic view of reality, particularly something that has to do with paranormal or conspiracies, no matter what proof is presented, even if its documented and scientific. A single factor they are they not open to is possibilities. Any possibility that challenges the views of the establishment is just not doable to them, even if the claims of the establishment itself are not scientific or contradicted by information. It does not even have to be paranormal, it can be Something that opposes the official version of events, such as conspiracies and lies by corrupt government officials or even the existence of shadow governments (which have been acknowledged to exist in the 80’s with the Iran Contra Scandal). Therefore, their bias and blind faith in authority as dogma is revealed. Even if a extremely credible supply with a extended history of accuracy abruptly tends to make a paranormal claim or a claim against an established view, they automatically dismiss it as bunk ahead of even hunting into it. If they do appear into it, it will not be to understand the truth about it, but to debunk it. They will even deny proof from scientific experiments as nicely. All the although, they tout, “”Show me the proof. Where’s the proof?”” But when they are shown the proof, they merely dismiss it or ignore it, acting as even though they heard nothing at all, then go back to repeating that there is no proof. I’ve observed them do this for years, in the media, on sites, in forum discussions, and on my personal mailing list. It is as even though they have been deaf and completely belief oriented, seeing only what they want to see. The issue for pseudoskeptics is that their denial and cognitive dissonance does NOT erase the proof from reality. It could erase it from their personal minds, but it does not the erase the proof itself. Therefore, it can be stated that they are deluded and do not face up to reality. Some examples of pseudoskeptics’ denial of proof and cognitive dissonance: * If a psychic or medium gets an wonderful hit, either anything extremely uncommon and certain that does not apply to absolutely everyone or a deep dark secret about you that no a single knows, which could NOT have been due to cold reading or guessing, then it indicates nothing at all to the pseudoskeptics, who will say that it have to have been a fortunate guess, or due to fraud or your personal faulty memory, simply because no a single has psychic skills. * If witnesses experiences a ghost, they have to have been hallucinating, have an active imagination, or lying. Ghosts do not exist, so it have to have been anything else. * If folks see UFO’s, such as educated Air Force Pilots and Astronauts, then they have to have misidentified all-natural phenomenon, simply because alien ships do not exist, at least not close to Earth. And this is so even if radar picked up objects performing maneuvers not possible for man-created aircraft. * If psychic skills are demonstrated below controlled circumstances (e.g. PEAR, Ganzfeld, SRI), then there have to have been flaws in the protocols or lack of controls, simply because psychic skills are not doable. Pseudo-skeptics then demand repeatability and peer critique. But when they get that, they then ask for extra repeatability, from skeptical scientists as nicely. The bar is continually raised till a skeptical scientist finds or imagines any flaw in the experiments and declares them debunked. Only then are they happy. Clearly, they only want a certain outcome (only opportunity outcomes), not the truth. If it does not get debunked, then they accuse the experimentors of improper controls or deceit, as Randi is infamous for carrying out. * They claim that no psi study that shows constructive outcomes has ever been published in credible scientific journals. But when they are shown citations that they have, they just turn out to be deaf and ignore them. Then they have the nerve to just repeat their lie once more, as if they by no means even heard you! This is incredibly infuriating and dishonest * If a resuscitated patient has an NDE or OBE exactly where he/she sees information that they could not have recognized about, then it have to have been fortunate guesses or unconscious memories, simply because there is no soul that can leave the physique.. Winston Wu is the founder of SCEPCOP – The Scientific Committee to Evaluate Pseudo-Skeptical Criticism of the Paranormal – at [http://www.debunkingskeptics.com] Short article Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/professional/Winston_Wu/129199 “


Like it? Share with your friends!

0
super