Abandon Religion


0
Religion (1)

Why Abandon Religion? It is so frequently believed right now that religion is a supply of goodness and charity for so numerous persons. It is also believed that to oppose religion is also to oppose the goodness and charity stipulated to be with it. When I ask other folks to abandon religion, they will reply, “”Why would you want to abandon anything that has created so numerous valuable issues?”” But I am not asking persons to give up the affectionate and tender strategies, laced with gentleness and humanity. I am not asking that they give up mercy or justice, issues which are just as effortlessly attainable without having religion, if not much easier. I am asking persons to give up their worry of hell and daemons, their belief in a soul and ghosts, their hope of an afterlife and a god, the creeds founded on the credulous superstitions of their ancestors. I am not asking the human species to relinquish the issues that are superior and accompany every single warm heart — I am asking the human species to ameliorate the ideology that a god exists that will punish nonbelievers and reward believers, that will smile at the sufferings of the damned and fortunes of the saved. I am asking other folks to abandon religion, which has been a under no circumstances-ending supply of intolerance for these who have harnessed any sort of bigotry. There might be these who persist in the assertion that religion is inseparable from goodness, and goodness from religion. Would any religionist be sincere to state that without having god, they would permit themselves to be heartless and brutal — to turn into the epitome of savage behavior, of unspirited meanness and sincere hatred? Would anybody who known as themselves close to god, and with superior intentions, if this person have been to all of a sudden uncover that there was no god, would they locate themselves to be much less considerate, much less hopeful, much less charitable? If any religious particular person can honestly say yes to this, then it would only be correct to be suspicious of the claim that they are hopeful, sort, or charitable now. God, this mythical becoming who lives apart from the physical globe, and his existence are only queries of science: he either exists or he does not. If he did not exist, it would hardly deprive anybody of ethical or moral behavior. If a city, a road, a mountain, a lake, or a organic formation did not exist that we had believed to exist, at discovering this, would we abandon all humaneness and all types of goodness? Only these who had reveled in hypocrisy and deceit can genuinely say so. There is practically nothing innately particular of the mythical beings known as gods that indicates their existence offers privilege to moral behavior. There are, even though, the genuine claims that we ought to not abandon religion on the grounds that religion has portrayed a truthful and sincere view of the globe. Although this claim produced be produced on the foundation that we ought to pursue the truth, it normally fails brief of that, simply because religion has universally been the opponent to investigation and inquiry. There have been occasions and eras exactly where the church had disallowed the public from reading or writing, and had produced it punishable by death to be discovered with a Bible written in regional languages. In 391, Christians burned down one particular of the world’s greatest libraries in Alexandra, stated to have housed 700,000 scrolls. [The New Columbia Encyclopedia, 61, and Eisler, The Chalice and the Blade.] The tale of Galileo ought to not need to have repeating, but probably the tale of Giordano Bruno or Francisco Ferrer need to have repeating. Although Galileo was only threatened with death for his claims, Giordano Bruno was burned to death for his tips in 1600 and Francisco Ferrer was shot to death for his beliefs in 1909 — each executed by the Roman Catholic Church. Giordano Bruno, the wonderful thinker, and Francisco Ferrer, the wonderful educator a day does not go by exactly where their grave loss is mourned by Rationalists and Humanitarians globe wide. Gregory the Excellent had the library of Palatine Apollo burned “”lest its secular literature distract the faithful males from the contemplation of heaven.”” [Barbara G. Walker, The Woman’s Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1983) 208.] The history of Christianity and organized religion runs parallel to the history of oppression and slavery. Examination and inquiry have been restrained, and this can be discovered in the evidences that every single historian ought to be properly conscious of. Even right now, we locate the similar radical fanatics, burning Harry Potter books, and on the similar precise claim that it will deprive young children of the religion of Christianity. We also locate Christian fanatics operating to ban books in public libraries, such as performs by Mark Twain, J. D. Salinger., and Maya Angelou, often on the precise claim that these performs are “”unChristian.”” But aside from the truth that religion tends to disallow Freethought and investigation, inquiry and science, can it at all be permitted to contact itself truth? As properly as possessing a lengthy history of suppressing sincere and sincere attempts at sciennce and truth, religion is also founded on superstition and myth. When man did not have an understanding of the origin of the rainbow, he postulated that it had divine origin. When man did not have an understanding of the origin of the human female, he produced the similar claim. When man did not have an understanding of something that was of organic phenomena, he normally occasions ran to the effortless and easy belief that it was developed from a god or a spirit or a ghost. Even beyond that, even though, the evidences and claims of religion are synonymous with numerous cultural myths. As I have discussed in other performs, Santa Claus and god each have a exceptional quantity of similarities: each are mystical beings, each reside far away, each have no proof, each are only believed simply because they are taught by neighborhood and elders, each have not been demonstrated, each have supernatural powers, amongst an huge quantity of other similarities. But if one particular is not content material to think that a man exists who delivers billions of presents to young children on one particular evening of the year, then why would one particular be content material to think that a man exists who delivers billions of souls to heaven or hell? Upon the hundreds and hundreds of fallacies and errors, we locate that religion itself is anything deprived of each merit and science. It has, for ages, worked against the instruments of truth, normally occasions denying the population the correct to assume and think as they want. We also locate that the foundation for the belief in religion is identical to the foundation for the belief in numerous cultural myths which have also been abandoned. There is tiny truth to be discovered in religion, as soon as an open-minded investigation has been permitted to examine its institutes. Alternatively of locating a realistic and open-minded viewpoint of the globe, we locate flaws, oppression, ignorance, and a sizable quantity of cruelty. Only a compact investigation into the actual globe would permit us to uncover that numerous men and women place a lot stock into the institute of religion. If we have been a absolutely free and intelligent persons, without having the tyranny of a Capitalist class and government defending them, persons would place much less concentration into the issues unseen and place such concentrate onto the actual, materialistic globe. Alternatively of investing in prayers, persons would be supplying their kindest and warmest affections to these about them. We would not make churches, but properties — we would not ask the gods for forgiveness for our actions, but these we harmed — we would not pray for issues to come about, but make them come about — we would not rely on the superstitious myths that have guided so numerous to bigotry, or rely on the unseen to do what we ought to do for ourselves, or praise something that was practically nothing much more than an idol representing cruelty and misguided violence. If a man reserves his appreciate for a god and for angels, he simultaneously deprives appreciate from these about him. By providing our kindness and affection, our sincerest dreams and hopes, desires and aspirations, to this becoming without having proof, we are losing concentrate of the one particular issue that we do know: our lives. And by losing concentrate on our lives, and these about us, we are ignoring the one particular issue that we know for positive: that we, as material beings, do exist, and that we are capable of feeling joy and suffering. To ignore this is the greatest of ignorances, and the most grave of all follies. Tolerance and Acceptance If there was a god, I would make only one particular prayer to him: That his followers would adhere to truth more than scripture, benevolence more than cruelty, science more than myth to ask his followers to be much more focused and concentrated on the issues that exist — their lovers, their loved ones, their young children, their pals — to uphold truth as attractive, and kindness as sincerity. There is no other prayer I could give to such a deity ruling more than our Universe. If I have been to make such a prayer, even though, it might quite properly be that such a god would ask him followers to turn against him. That would only be so, nonetheless, only if the god that exists was the one particular of a well-known Monotheistic religion. Such gods have a tendency to be described by their scripture as vicious and unrelenting in their pursuits to handle mankind to devious ends. Religion and its followers have embraced intolerance and have known as it duty and reverence to their lord. Although the disciples of the cross have managed to do every little thing in their energy to destroy liberty and happiness, I would be the final man on this Earth to say that no one ought to be permitted to be a disciple of the cross, or a follower of any religion. It has been the custom of religion to oppose freedom of believed, but I definitely can not oppose this freedom in any kind. No matter if a man desires to be a Christian or an Atheist, a Buddhist or a Hindu, it is their personal selection. It is their actions, and not their beliefs, that ought to be monitored. My belief that every person ought to be entitled to their belief (as properly as beliefs about beliefs) is not derived from the concept that we ought to not be like these we oppose. Rather, it is formed from the concept that every person deserves the correct to think as they want, to take into consideration and investigate for themselves, that energy lies inside the person, and even much more deeper, simply because I think in humane and fair remedy, I think in justice and compassion. These are the causes that are behind my belief in the correct to assume and think as one particular wishes. There are some Christians who I have heard say, “”I will not speak to that man or deal with that man unless he is a Christian.”” There are also numerous Christians who speak of myself as even though I am the initial Atheist to stroll this planet. But as properly as speaking of me with that harsh, grave tone, they have systematically produced up lies about myself, claiming that I hate all who claim to be Christians. It appears not possible to some of the followers of the divine for Atheists or Agnostics, or any infidel or heretic, to hold charity and mercy as superior values. It might often even be regarded unfulfilling to help an nonbeliever in any way, to present them any sort of affection or kindness, to give them the fruits of a warm heart. But no matter if somebody believes that a god exists or not, or in any religion, there will be one particular truth about that particular person that will not waver my humane remedy of them: that they are a conscious becoming, that they can really feel discomfort and suffering or joy and happiness, that touching their skin gently will make feelings and feelings of safety and happiness. This is anything that will not be erased, no matter what creeds an person professes to think, no matter what ideologies an person follows. The Objective of a Rationalist Humanitarian My goal is not to turn every single man an lady into an Atheist or an Agnostic. Such a proposal would be impractical and tough to acquire, at finest. My goal is to present humane and rational options in comparison to the brutal and dogmatic options presented by other folks. I would like to convince the clergy and the ministry to teach their youth how to respect every other, and not how to respect god. I would like to convince these who think in religion that there is no hell. I would like to convince religionists that there is no need to have to cry in worry of god’s punishment, that if there is a god, he is merciful and just. Providing all of the kindness and affection that can be mustered from a sincere heart, I would like to present the globe all I can to make it a superior spot for every person to reside. To maximize happiness, to teach persons how to treat every other warmly and thoughtfully, to teach them how to assume rationally and logically, to teach them tolerance and acceptance, beauty and appreciate, duty and kindness… This is my goal as a Rationalist and a Humanitarian. http://www.punkerslut.com For Life, Punkerslut Punkerslut (or Andy Carloff) has been writing essays and poetry on social problems which have caught his focus for a number of years. His web page http://www.punkerslut.com offers a comprehensive list of all of these writings. His life practical experience incorporates homelessness, squating in New Orleans and LA, dropping out of higher college, obtaining expelled from college for “”subversive activities,”” and a myriad of other revolutionary actions. Short article Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/specialist/Andy_Carloff/6239 “”Abandon Religion By Andy Carloff  |   Submitted On Might 31, 2005 1 Why Abandon Religion? It is so frequently believed right now that religion is a supply of goodness and charity for so numerous persons. It is also believed that to oppose religion is also to oppose the goodness and charity stipulated to be with it. When I ask other folks to abandon religion, they will reply, “”Why would you want to abandon anything that has created so numerous valuable issues?”” But I am not asking persons to give up the affectionate and tender strategies, laced with gentleness and humanity. I am not asking that they give up mercy or justice, issues which are just as effortlessly attainable without having religion, if not much easier. I am asking persons to give up their worry of hell and daemons, their belief in a soul and ghosts, their hope of an afterlife and a god, the creeds founded on the credulous superstitions of their ancestors. I am not asking the human species to relinquish the issues that are superior and accompany every single warm heart — I am asking the human species to ameliorate the ideology that a god exists that will punish nonbelievers and reward believers, that will smile at the sufferings of the damned and fortunes of the saved. I am asking other folks to abandon religion, which has been a under no circumstances-ending supply of intolerance for these who have harnessed any sort of bigotry. There might be these who persist in the assertion that religion is inseparable from goodness, and goodness from religion. Would any religionist be sincere to state that without having god, they would permit themselves to be heartless and brutal — to turn into the epitome of savage behavior, of unspirited meanness and sincere hatred? Would anybody who known as themselves close to god, and with superior intentions, if this person have been to all of a sudden uncover that there was no god, would they locate themselves to be much less considerate, much less hopeful, much less charitable? If any religious particular person can honestly say yes to this, then it would only be correct to be suspicious of the claim that they are hopeful, sort, or charitable now. God, this mythical becoming who lives apart from the physical globe, and his existence are only queries of science: he either exists or he does not. If he did not exist, it would hardly deprive anybody of ethical or moral behavior. If a city, a road, a mountain, a lake, or a organic formation did not exist that we had believed to exist, at discovering this, would we abandon all humaneness and all types of goodness? Only these who had reveled in hypocrisy and deceit can genuinely say so. There is practically nothing innately particular of the mythical beings known as gods that indicates their existence offers privilege to moral behavior. There are, even though, the genuine claims that we ought to not abandon religion on the grounds that religion has portrayed a truthful and sincere view of the globe. Although this claim produced be produced on the foundation that we ought to pursue the truth, it normally fails brief of that, simply because religion has universally been the opponent to investigation and inquiry. There have been occasions and eras exactly where the church had disallowed the public from reading or writing, and had produced it punishable by death to be discovered with a Bible written in regional languages. In 391, Christians burned down one particular of the world’s greatest libraries in Alexandra, stated to have housed 700,000 scrolls. [The New Columbia Encyclopedia, 61, and Eisler, The Chalice and the Blade.] The tale of Galileo ought to not need to have repeating, but probably the tale of Giordano Bruno or Francisco Ferrer need to have repeating. Although Galileo was only threatened with death for his claims, Giordano Bruno was burned to death for his tips in 1600 and Francisco Ferrer was shot to death for his beliefs in 1909 — each executed by the Roman Catholic Church. Giordano Bruno, the wonderful thinker, and Francisco Ferrer, the wonderful educator a day does not go by exactly where their grave loss is mourned by Rationalists and Humanitarians globe wide. Gregory the Excellent had the library of Palatine Apollo burned “”lest its secular literature distract the faithful males from the contemplation of heaven.”” [Barbara G. Walker, The Woman’s Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1983) 208.] The history of Christianity and organized religion runs parallel to the history of oppression and slavery. Examination and inquiry have been restrained, and this can be discovered in the evidences that every single historian ought to be properly conscious of. Even right now, we locate the similar radical fanatics, burning Harry Potter books, and on the similar precise claim that it will deprive young children of the religion of Christianity. We also locate Christian fanatics operating to ban books in public libraries, such as performs by Mark Twain, J. D. Salinger., and Maya Angelou, often on the precise claim that these performs are “”unChristian.”” But aside from the truth that religion tends to disallow Freethought and investigation, inquiry and science, can it at all be permitted to contact itself truth? As properly as possessing a lengthy history of suppressing sincere and sincere attempts at sciennce and truth, religion is also founded on superstition and myth. When man did not have an understanding of the origin of the rainbow, he postulated that it had divine origin. When man did not have an understanding of the origin of the human female, he produced the similar claim. When man did not have an understanding of something that was of organic phenomena, he normally occasions ran to the effortless and easy belief that it was developed from a god or a spirit or a ghost. Even beyond that, even though, the evidences and claims of religion are synonymous with numerous cultural myths. As I have discussed in other performs, Santa Claus and god each have a exceptional quantity of similarities: each are mystical beings, each reside far away, each have no proof, each are only believed simply because they are taught by neighborhood and elders, each have not been demonstrated, each have supernatural powers, amongst an huge quantity of other similarities. But if one particular is not content material to think that a man exists who delivers billions of presents to young children on one particular evening of the year, then why would one particular be content material to think that a man exists who delivers billions of souls to heaven or hell? Upon the hundreds and hundreds of fallacies and errors, we locate that religion itself is anything deprived of each merit and science. It has, for ages, worked against the instruments of truth, normally occasions denying the population the correct to assume and think as they want. We also locate that the foundation for the belief in religion is identical to the foundation for the belief in numerous cultural myths which have also been abandoned. There is tiny truth to be discovered in religion, as soon as an open-minded investigation has been permitted to examine its institutes. Alternatively of locating a realistic and open-minded viewpoint of the globe, we locate flaws, oppression, ignorance, and a sizable quantity of cruelty. Only a compact investigation into the actual globe would permit us to uncover that numerous men and women place a lot stock into the institute of religion. If we have been a absolutely free and intelligent persons, without having the tyranny of a Capitalist class and government defending them, persons would place much less concentration into the issues unseen and place such concentrate onto the actual, materialistic globe. Alternatively of investing in prayers, persons would be supplying their kindest and warmest affections to these about them. We would not make churches, but properties — we would not ask the gods for forgiveness for our actions, but these we harmed — we would not pray for issues to come about, but make them come about — we would not rely on the superstitious myths that have guided so numerous to bigotry, or rely on the unseen to do what we ought to do for ourselves, or praise something that was practically nothing much more than an idol representing cruelty and misguided violence. If a man reserves his appreciate for a god and for angels, he simultaneously deprives appreciate from these about him. By providing our kindness and affection, our sincerest dreams and hopes, desires and aspirations, to this becoming without having proof, we are losing concentrate of the one particular issue that we do know: our lives. And by losing concentrate on our lives, and these about us, we are ignoring the one particular issue that we know for positive: that we, as material beings, do exist, and that we are capable of feeling joy and suffering. To ignore this is the greatest of ignorances, and the most grave of all follies. Tolerance and Acceptance If there was a god, I would make only one particular prayer to him: That his followers would adhere to truth more than scripture, benevolence more than cruelty, science more than myth to ask his followers to be much more focused and concentrated on the issues that exist — their lovers, their loved ones, their young children, their pals — to uphold truth as attractive, and kindness as sincerity. There is no other prayer I could give to such a deity ruling more than our Universe. If I have been to make such a prayer, even though, it might quite properly be that such a god would ask him followers to turn against him. That would only be so, nonetheless, only if the god that exists was the one particular of a well-known Monotheistic religion. Such gods have a tendency to be described by their scripture as vicious and unrelenting in their pursuits to handle mankind to devious ends. Religion and its followers have embraced intolerance and have known as it duty and reverence to their lord. Although the disciples of the cross have managed to do every little thing in their energy to destroy liberty and happiness, I would be the final man on this Earth to say that no one ought to be permitted to be a disciple of the cross, or a follower of any religion. It has been the custom of religion to oppose freedom of believed, but I definitely can not oppose this freedom in any kind. No matter if a man desires to be a Christian or an Atheist, a Buddhist or a Hindu, it is their personal selection. It is their actions, and not their beliefs, that ought to be monitored. My belief that every person ought to be entitled to their belief (as properly as beliefs about beliefs) is not derived from the concept that we ought to not be like these we oppose. Rather, it is formed from the concept that every person deserves the correct to think as they want, to take into consideration and investigate for themselves, that energy lies inside the person, and even much more deeper, simply because I think in humane and fair remedy, I think in justice and compassion. These are the causes that are behind my belief in the correct to assume and think as one particular wishes. There are some Christians who I have heard say, “”I will not speak to that man or deal with that man unless he is a Christian.”” There are also numerous Christians who speak of myself as even though I am the initial Atheist to stroll this planet. But as properly as speaking of me with that harsh, grave tone, they have systematically produced up lies about myself, claiming that I hate all who claim to be Christians. It appears not possible to some of the followers of the divine for Atheists or Agnostics, or any infidel or heretic, to hold charity and mercy as superior values. It might often even be regarded unfulfilling to help an nonbeliever in any way, to present them any sort of affection or kindness, to give them the fruits of a warm heart. But no matter if somebody believes that a god exists or not, or in any religion, there will be one particular truth about that particular person that will not waver my humane remedy of them: that they are a conscious becoming, that they can really feel discomfort and suffering or joy and happiness, that touching their skin gently will make feelings and feelings of safety and happiness. This is anything that will not be erased, no matter what creeds an person professes to think, no matter what ideologies an person follows. The Objective of a Rationalist Humanitarian My goal is not to turn every single man an lady into an Atheist or an Agnostic. Such a proposal would be impractical and tough to acquire, at finest. My goal is to present humane and rational options in comparison to the brutal and dogmatic options presented by other folks. I would like to convince the clergy and the ministry to teach their youth how to respect every other, and not how to respect god. I would like to convince these who think in religion that there is no hell. I would like to convince religionists that there is no need to have to cry in worry of god’s punishment, that if there is a god, he is merciful and just. Providing all of the kindness and affection that can be mustered from a sincere heart, I would like to present the globe all I can to make it a superior spot for every person to reside. To maximize happiness, to teach persons how to treat every other warmly and thoughtfully, to teach them how to assume rationally and logically, to teach them tolerance and acceptance, beauty and appreciate, duty and kindness… This is my goal as a Rationalist and a Humanitarian. http://www.punkerslut.com For Life, Punkerslut Punkerslut (or Andy Carloff) has been writing essays and poetry on social problems which have caught his focus for a number of years. His web page http://www.punkerslut.com offers a comprehensive list of all of these writings. His life practical experience incorporates homelessness, squating in New Orleans and LA, dropping out of higher college, obtaining expelled from college for “”subversive activities,”” and a myriad of other revolutionary actions. Short article Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/specialist/Andy_Carloff/6239 “


Like it? Share with your friends!

0
super